<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real-a-Save Blog &#187; Boulder City Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realasave.com/blog/tag/boulder-city-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realasave.com/blog</link>
	<description>Denver and Boulder real estate- search the MLS, map search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Boulder House Size Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.realasave.com/blog/2009/10/23/boulder-house-size-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realasave.com/blog/2009/10/23/boulder-house-size-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Connors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boulder, CO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder listings for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realasave.com/blog/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a bit about the new Boulder house size regulations and how an organization called Leave My Home Alone has formed to oppose the recently enacted rule.</p>
<p>I do hope this organization has some luck in their endeavors.  That said, I wanted to acknowledge the spirit of the rule in regards to keeping so called &#8220;McMansions&#8221; from sprouting up all over Boulder.  I understand the good intentions of the rule.  I do.  And even though I don&#8217;t agree with it, I do think that the City Council had good intentions when drafting it.  </p>
<p>The main issue I have with the rule is that it was enacted by a small group of 5 City Councilmen, and was not put to a vote to Boulder residents.  Boulder is home to some pretty bright folks, and I&#8217;m certain they have the brain power to digest the details and decide for themselves.  </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a bit about the new Boulder house size regulations and how an organization called Leave My Home Alone has formed to oppose the recently enacted rule.</p>
<p>I do hope this organization has some luck in their endeavors.  That said, I wanted to acknowledge the spirit of the rule in regards to keeping so called &#8220;McMansions&#8221; from sprouting up all over Boulder.  I understand the good intentions of the rule.  I do.  And even though I don&#8217;t agree with it, I do think that the City Council had good intentions when drafting it.  </p>
<p>The main issue I have with the rule is that it was enacted by a small group of 5 City Councilmen, and was not put to a vote to Boulder residents.  Boulder is home to some pretty bright folks, and I&#8217;m certain they have the brain power to digest the details and decide for themselves.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realasave.com/blog/2009/10/23/boulder-house-size-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve Got Mine</title>
		<link>http://www.realasave.com/blog/2009/10/21/ive-got-mine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realasave.com/blog/2009/10/21/ive-got-mine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Connors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boulder, CO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search boulder mls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realasave.com/blog/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the big debates in the City of Boulder has to do with the proposed &#8220;pops and scrapes&#8221; ordinance which will limit structure size in Boulder.  This issue has been debated and detailed in many other blogs and news sites around town, so I won&#8217;t bore you with all the details.  But basically, City Council wants to limit what Boulder homeowners can do with their own property.  It&#8217;s not known as The People&#8217;s Republic of Boulder for no reason&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, in theory, this sounds fine.  Who wants to wake up one morning and as Councilman Macon Cowles says, &#8220;find the Queen Mary parked next to their house?&#8221;.  But the problem is that there are only about 100 6,000+ square foot homes in Boulder.  And the council is aiming its actions at &#8220;preserving&#8221; neighborhoods/structures in the 1200-2000 square foot range.  Those are they guys they&#8217;re protecting.  But&#8230;</p>
<p>Listen to t<a href="http://www.kcfr.org/cgi-bin/comatters/comatters_play.asx?play=5154&amp;type=comatters.asx" target="_blank">his interview on CPR Colorado Matters </a>between homeowner Warren Hultquist and councilman Macon Cowles.  In it, Hultquist  points out that he simply wants to make an addition in order to access his basement square footage, and that his home is in the neighborhood of the 1200-2000 square foot range mentioned above.  But this new ordinance would prohibit him from making such modest additions.</p>
<p>The part that just rubs me the wrong way about Macon Cowles&#8217; championing of the new size limit ordinance is this: councilman Cowles lives in a 4,800 square foot home.  That&#8217;s a huge home for Boulder.  A huge home.  Does anything about this rub you the wrong way?</p>
<p>Furthermore, the City Council is opposed to the idea of putting any such ordinance to a general vote because, as council member Macon Cowles says in the attached interview, the issue is too complex for laypeople to understand.  Hmmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d encourage Boulder residents to visit the website <a href="http://leavemyhomealone.org/site/" target="_blank">Leave My Home Alone</a> when they have a moment.  This is taken from the LMHA position statement on their website:</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;The Proposed Regulations are Anti-Family and Unfair</em></strong></p>
<p><em>The proposed regulations are anti-family and would unfairly restrict the right of Boulder citizens to build additions to or remodel their homes and unfairly decrease property values, thereby effectively snuffing out the hopes, plans, and dreams of people living and working in Boulder. The proposed regulations are a “one-size fits all” approach that goes too far and would prohibit many types of appropriate additions and remodels. The proposed regulations would have a disproportionate impact on relatively modest neighborhoods like Martin Acres, Aurora 7, West Highlands and Columbine. If families can’t grow in their homes, they will move elsewhere, thereby exacerbating the loss of families with children in Boulder and the declining enrollment in Boulder’s schools.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Fair warning to all Boulder residents: you need to inform yourselves and voice your concerns to your City Council!</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the big debates in the City of Boulder has to do with the proposed &#8220;pops and scrapes&#8221; ordinance which will limit structure size in Boulder.  This issue has been debated and detailed in many other blogs and news sites around town, so I won&#8217;t bore you with all the details.  But basically, City Council wants to limit what Boulder homeowners can do with their own property.  It&#8217;s not known as The People&#8217;s Republic of Boulder for no reason&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, in theory, this sounds fine.  Who wants to wake up one morning and as Councilman Macon Cowles says, &#8220;find the Queen Mary parked next to their house?&#8221;.  But the problem is that there are only about 100 6,000+ square foot homes in Boulder.  And the council is aiming its actions at &#8220;preserving&#8221; neighborhoods/structures in the 1200-2000 square foot range.  Those are they guys they&#8217;re protecting.  But&#8230;</p>
<p>Listen to t<a href="http://www.kcfr.org/cgi-bin/comatters/comatters_play.asx?play=5154&amp;type=comatters.asx" target="_blank">his interview on CPR Colorado Matters </a>between homeowner Warren Hultquist and councilman Macon Cowles.  In it, Hultquist  points out that he simply wants to make an addition in order to access his basement square footage, and that his home is in the neighborhood of the 1200-2000 square foot range mentioned above.  But this new ordinance would prohibit him from making such modest additions.</p>
<p>The part that just rubs me the wrong way about Macon Cowles&#8217; championing of the new size limit ordinance is this: councilman Cowles lives in a 4,800 square foot home.  That&#8217;s a huge home for Boulder.  A huge home.  Does anything about this rub you the wrong way?</p>
<p>Furthermore, the City Council is opposed to the idea of putting any such ordinance to a general vote because, as council member Macon Cowles says in the attached interview, the issue is too complex for laypeople to understand.  Hmmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d encourage Boulder residents to visit the website <a href="http://leavemyhomealone.org/site/" target="_blank">Leave My Home Alone</a> when they have a moment.  This is taken from the LMHA position statement on their website:</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;The Proposed Regulations are Anti-Family and Unfair</em></strong></p>
<p><em>The proposed regulations are anti-family and would unfairly restrict the right of Boulder citizens to build additions to or remodel their homes and unfairly decrease property values, thereby effectively snuffing out the hopes, plans, and dreams of people living and working in Boulder. The proposed regulations are a “one-size fits all” approach that goes too far and would prohibit many types of appropriate additions and remodels. The proposed regulations would have a disproportionate impact on relatively modest neighborhoods like Martin Acres, Aurora 7, West Highlands and Columbine. If families can’t grow in their homes, they will move elsewhere, thereby exacerbating the loss of families with children in Boulder and the declining enrollment in Boulder’s schools.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Fair warning to all Boulder residents: you need to inform yourselves and voice your concerns to your City Council!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realasave.com/blog/2009/10/21/ive-got-mine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
